future-series
The first shipment of future controllers has been delivered, and we
have already received many positive reports about their compact design and
excellent performance.
However, some users have had problems with motors failing to start.
We have tested a large number of different motors produced by various
manufacturers, and our findings are as follows: The poor start-up characteristics described above have brought to our notice
a problem with a particular Plettenberg motor, which is either a labelling error
or the incorrect use of an "S" rotor for increased rotational speed (i.e. lower
torque) in a motor which is actually intended for direct drive. The motor
concerned bears the label HP 220/30/A5-P4, but in reality it is an HP
220/30/A5-P4 S, whose data have not yet been printed in the Plettenberg
catalogue. This applies to motors delivered up to this time (15.10.1999).
Naturally the Bergemann company will replace the rotor in your motor if it
proves to be unsuitable for your application.
We regret that a micro-processor programming
error has slipped into the slim series. We regret this error, and are sorry for any inconvenience caused. Relatively old Robbe and Futaba receivers are particularly prone to problems
with receiver signal detection, as these receivers feature a very
high-resistance signal stage, and the signals are only about 3.3 Volts in
magnitude.
whenever a problem arises
with a motor failing to start, the cause is always either a nearly flat drive
battery, a battery with too few cells (cell count below the range stated by the
motor manufacturer), or too large a propeller.
In short: if your motor
fails to start, this always indicates an unsatisfactory or unreliable system
combination.
To avoid a large number of complaints from users, we have
now included a little more intelligence in version 3 of the future-bo's
software:
The motor is now analysed during the initial start-up when a new
battery pack is connected. This avoids all these problems, at least in the case
of minor mis-matches, e.g. a 30-cell motor will now run on 6 cells.
This
also makes it straightforward to use a large-diameter direct-drive propeller
(e.g. 25/15 cm = 10/6") on a motor designed primarily for ducted fan use (e.g.
90 mm /3.54" impellers). However, this does not make such a combination a
sensible proposition, as it will undoubtedly cause the motor to draw a current
far in excess of its maximum permissible load (e.g. 50 A from a motor rated at
35 A), and this is very likely to cause damage to the motor.
For this
reason we strongly recommend that you use a clamp ammeter to measure the load
current at full throttle, to ensure that the motor is running within the
permissible range specified by the manufacturer.
slim-series
Controllers featuring a software
version lower than V9 (slim-08) and lower than V40 (other slims) contain an
error which shows up as follows:
If you operate the controller at
half-throttle for a protracted period, the micro-processor erroneously detects a
'low voltage'condition, and switches the motor off.
As this error is only
evident when the tolerances of the controllers'components are unfavourable and
when certain transmitters and receiving systems are used, we did not discover
the error in the laboratory.
If you
are a customer who has encountered this problem with your slim controller, we
will naturally exchange the micro-processor in the unit at no charge.
The
software version in your controller is inscribed on the processor of the
slim-08, and on the type placard next to the date on other models of the slim.
In rare cases this can cause the controller to fail to detect the
receiver signal. This only occurs when the micro-processor's switching threshold
is higher than the usual 2.5 V.
Naturally we are also prepared to help you
in this instance, provided that the cause is beyond doubt. It is very helpful if
you can send us your receiver for checking, so that we can measure the signals.